The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Rieber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST, declined many times at draft and speedy deleted also, so bringing here. Theroadislong (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - one promotional Q&A is far from enough to pass WP:GNG; nothing better found in searches. Disappointing that the creator has ignored messages relating to paid editing; I have given them another message to remind them of this requirement. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it has enough mentions in reliable sources to be notable, and it isn't promotional in tone. Raymond Riebz (talk) 17:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)— Raymond Riebz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please can you point us to the reliable sources, they are not in the draft yet. Theroadislong (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Riebz also has a COI for this article declared on their user page. --- Possibly (talk) 06:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete obviously not notable. No indication of artistic recognition (exhibitions, reviews, collections). We are not here to host vanity pages. --- Possibly (talk) 15:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Cannot see that the subject can be considered notable. 'Google' search revealed little, if anything, of note. Eagleash (talk) 15:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails BIo and GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, does not meet WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG, no works held in wikinotable galleries/museums, no reviews of works found, wikipedia is not here to publicize people. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Prior to a move from the draft namespace, this was rejected due to a lack of coverage in reliable sources, and it has not sufficiently improved to belong in the article namespace. Fails WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.