The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sick Animation[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article that has held a notability tag since 2011. I fear that it might just fail Wikipedia's long standing general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 04:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The only independent ref I see in the article is from Axiom Magazine, which doesn't seem notable. Seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (web) otherwise. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and as per previous deletion discussion. Fails WP:WEB. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.