The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per WP:NBOOK. 1. The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself. Mentioned on the article page. 2. The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. Jyoti (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. The nomination seems to be in bad faith. The nominator had edit dispute with the creator of this article on some other article.Shyamsunder (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.