The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shinsei Hapkido

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's only source is the organization's home page. There is nothing in the article that shows notability, such as meeting WP:MANOTE. Article is also partly written like an editorial and uses plenty of peacock terms. Papaursa (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Article doesn't meet WP:MANOTE and has no independent sources. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 13:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no supported claims of notability and I found no significant coverage in any independent sources. Mdtemp (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.