The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as the current article is unacceptable and although my searches found results to confirm this product's existence, there were none for better improvement. SwisterTwistertalk07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears a bit too promotional in nature with inherent problematic features to the content stylistic presentation. — Cirt (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.