The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shannara. Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shannara timeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artice is a WP:CONTENTFORK of another article. The other article has the potential to be encyclopedic with articles that directly cover the series, and WP:NOT#PLOT information such as development and reception. This article has no third-party sources that directly talk about the chronology, and it will be very hard to talk about development or reception of this timeline. Shooterwalker (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- I agree with the nominator. This is in-universe plot summary unsupported by a single reliable independent source. I suspect much of it is OR as well. Reyk _YO! 08:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, completely in-universe information that is not notable outside the book series. JIP | Talk 10:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Shannara#History_of_the_Shannara_World Sadads (talk) 02:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Shannara proper. The timeline is already adequately covered, though in multiple sections, so I don't see a need to do a specific section redirect, contra Sadads. Jclemens (talk) 06:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.