The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 19:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shams ul Fuqara

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. Declined AfC submission posted in main space, see Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Shams ul Fuqara. An earlier, even spammier version was speedied before, but can still be seen at User:Mrashid364. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: originator has not provided evidence of WP:Notability, and current text is still spammy/promotional and written for adherents, rather than a neutral treatment for a global audience. MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.