The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Living person and no sources even after an AfD mandates deletion per WP:BLP. Sandstein 10:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shai Specht

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources (no sources at all, in fact), and no apparent notability. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see much connection to academics/education here. Article looks like commercial link spam. No sources. I hope we will have an explanation from the unprodder. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Doesn't look notable, no sources, no claims of any kind seem to warrant inclusion. Yossiea ^(talk) 17:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google news turns up no biographical information or critical review of this person, just a smattering of "Shai Specht will be performing at..." type stuff. Nothing indepth indicates not above the baseline notability threshhold. Unless other sources turn up, this one lacks enough to be kept.--Jayron32 17:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No real claim of notability and no WP:RS. The article reads largely as an advert for his services. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Comment. This page was deleted without authorisation. I have restored it. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. It seems that there are notable references/sources to education, place of ordination and valid organizations. Some who are vying for deletion are not doing so from a bias perspective but from a place of slander and misinformation. --Brahmas3334 (talk) 12:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Your contribs suggest that you're a WP:SPA created specifically to preserve this article. Note that one's level of education, place of ordination (if applicable), or organizations are not relevant aspects of notability. Also, I'm sure the panelists above would like to know which of them you're accusing of "slander and misinformation". Care to elaborate? It would probably also be appropriate for you to comment on your removal of various tags, as requested above. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO. BTW, this whole page is a copyright violation, as it is lifted word-for-word from Rabbi Shai's home page. Yoninah (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.