The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Serbian diaspora. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2022)} 05:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Mexicans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, I can't find any coverage of this topic at all in books and academic databases, having searched Google Scholar, Google Books, and my local university database for several plausible variations on the subject title in English and Spanish. Maybe someone can find high-quality sources in Serbian, but I doubt it. We should not be coining articles for ethnic sub-groups unless they have received notability-generating coverage in peer-reviewed sources. Among the sources in the article, the closest anything comes to providing the solid ethnographic coverage that would justify an article is [1], which is primarily about the Serbian embassy in Mexico rather than "Serbian Mexicans", is woefully superficial as an ethnography of the Serbian Mexican community. Restore the redirect to Serbian diaspora, where a section can be developed using the more trivial and lower quality sources that do exist about Serbians in Mexico. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. Source 2 doesn’t even mention Mexico. Source 3 says there are 3000 Serbs in Mexico and they don’t even have their own church. To small and unorganised to be notable. Mccapra (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. This article appears to have been poorly translated from another language, although I don't know what the original source was or what language it was in. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.