This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 22:04, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

A (self-proclaimed) neologism, that "originated in 2001". I've never heard of it, and I can't find any evidence of its existence on Google. It was hard to do a search for it, because of abreviations for September, so I searched for the "related phrase," "septed fool." That picked up no hits at all, so I very much doubt the rest of the article as well. Not notable, and in any case a dicdef, so delete. --Dmcdevit·t 20:43, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete The article says that "the term is new and relatively obscure". Ta da! Say no more. DES 20:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fake, and dictdef even if it ain't. Tempshill 22:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons already stated. --Idont Havaname 23:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete slang dicdef. JamesBurns 04:46, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we need a word for this concept, but not a Wikipedia entry. Ppe42 05:25, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete how about Krunk? Rich Farmbrough 22:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. To me, Sept (slang) was that clique of V:tM players in high school... Almafeta 01:09, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.