The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SemEval-1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

SemEval-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Senseval-1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Senseval-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Senseval-3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If this is about a workshop, I must ask: are workshops notable? I don't think so. Even if they are, there's no indication of importance or significance, and no reliable, independent, third-party coverage provided. See also:: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SemEval. — Timneu22 · talk 17:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, appears to just be a list of links to workshop sessions, with explanations. No evidence given of notability of this particular conference.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nomination, no sources supporting notability of these workshops and the content of each duplicates content already at SemEval. ukexpat (talk) 18:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. Wikipedia is not a free host. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. The concepts considered by these conferences should be summarized in a prose form and added to articles on computational linguistics or natural language processing. This is legitimate academic work, but presenting the conference schedule in a table does not help the average wikipedia user. Racepacket (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. Let the conferences' sponsor get its own website. —Tamfang (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The editor is in the process of breaking up the SemEval article as I suggested it is too long. This discussion should not be separate from the SemEval discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ffbond (talk • contribs) 01:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. These are essentially lists of external links to workshop/conference web sites. Such information is no doubt helpful to workshop participants and those in the same field, but it not the sort of information that encyclopedia users are looking for and is specifically ruled out by the aforementioned policy. Cnilep (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & Redirect to SemEval assuming any information is actually needed in the parent article. Each of these are plausible search terms. Main article needs major cleanup, but that is a seperate issue. Turlo Lomon (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems to be using Wikipedia for webhosting Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.