The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy G11 by Anthony.bradbury. Non-admin closure. Tevildo (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See salt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod. Advert masquerading as an article about salt with a black additive. See salt appears to be the brand name of a non-notable product. Nancy ^talk 07:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - product not notable. Crafty (talk) 07:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - agree with aboveDroliver (talk) 08:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Looks like an advert. The idea seems feeble. The concept, rather than the product, might merit a mention on a disability aids article. No evidence of need ore effectiveness.--Brunnian (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an advertisement. And at least I can see normal white salt perfectly well. JIP | Talk 13:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as advert, the sole reference cited points to a website registered to an email of globalblue1@xxxx.com, which matches the username of the article's creator, according to WHOIS. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 14:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as spam. Tagged as spam. DarkAudit (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.