The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 02:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Siege of Atlantis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

uncontested prod, but some editors think that these sort of articles merit keeping, so I'll bring it here rather than just delete as expired prod; IMHO delete as fancruft. Carlossuarez46 01:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I prodded it and of course agree it should be deleted, per WP:PLOT. No significance established by reliable sources within or outside the fictional universe. Otto4711 01:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with comment usually I prefer waiting until the prod is either contested or expired. However, this is a clear cut violation of WP:PLOT and WP:NOT#INFO.--Sethacus 02:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Just a note: all of these prods had expired, this included, but rather than just going ahead and deleting these closer calls, I brought them here for consensus. Carlossuarez46 02:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fancruft. We appreciate the consideration, but you should have gone ahead and axed these when the prod expired. Realkyhick 18:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.