The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sayward Forest Canoe Route

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP is not a travel guide book, as per WP:NOTGUIDE. If the canoe routes are notable on their own, a section on canoe travel should be added to Sayward Valley. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Sayward Valley, or send it over to Wikivoyage. TheBlueCanoe 02:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.