The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwiki to Wiktionary. --VS talk 11:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarav viapak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Nomination. Article provides barely any information. Definately not something you would find in a encyclopedia. Maybe it should be moved to the Wiktionary. --eskimospy (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.