The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Rich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

99% unsourced autobiography with no indication of notability per WP:NMODEL or WP:BIO. No significant coverage of her online from WP:RS. Won a beauty contest last year called "Mrs UK World" that I can find nothing about online, apart from their FB and website, and local press articles on the nominees, like the single reference cited. Article claims that she's in the running for Mrs. World, for which the article was deleted in January on grounds of notability: WP:Articles_for_deletion/Mrs._World. OnionRing (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I tried to clean the article up, but I could not find reliable sources to support the content aside from brief mentions in the local paper. This person competed in several non-notable pageants and nobody reliable noticed. As nominator states, coverage is mainly social media like Facebook. Nowhere even close to passing GNG or WP:NMODEL. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nothing redeeming. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete her only claim to notability is winning a non-notalbe pageant, so it amounts to no claim at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and I myself would've nominated also had I found this, nothing at all close to any applicable notability whatsoever. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I did find coverage of her [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]. However I find it strange that all coverage it restricted to "barkinganddagenhampost" which seems to be a local news source. I would have at least expected some coverage in any national British newspaper. Till such sources are found I think this should be deleted for failing WP:GNG --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's right: Barking & Dagenham Post is a local weekly. OnionRing (talk) 10:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete: Unless winning Mrs UK World is default notable, we don't have anything more. Montanabw^(talk) 02:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.