The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw. The easiest solution to this is to redirect the page to Freshly Squeezed, the programme for which this presenter is most noted. Anyone entering a search for this name can be directed to that article.

Sarah Hendy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I nominated this after it was PRODded for deletion in order to generate some discussion on the topic. Please see below for further details TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I feel some history is required here. I created this article on 31/07/2008 which was quickly nominated for speedy deletion by User:Andyjsmith. User:NawlinWiki declined the speedy deletion on the grounds that the article asserts notability. AndyJSmith then PRODded the article for deletion giving the reason "One of many hundreds of minor UK TV presenters - no assertion of notability, no references". A Google Search generates several hits for this presenter (see here), but no reliable references. I also notice previous pages titled "Sarah Hendy" have been speedily deleted, but these don't appear to be about this subject or were deleted due to copyvio issues, which was why I created the page. Though I created this article, I won't lose any sleep whatever the outcome of this debate, but given the difference of opinion, I feel some discussion on the issue is probably appropriate. TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • My own solution to this is to Redirect it to Freshly Squeezed. TheRetroGuy (talk) 23:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect with a slight leaning towards redirect. Minor TV presenters are 10 a penny. I can't find any serious third party coverage of this person, just lots of idiots drooling about how sexy she is. andy (talk) 10:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Having had time to reflect on this I think I'll withdraw the debate and redirect the page to Freshly Squeezed. This appears to be the thing she is most noted for so I can imagine that the aforementioned drooling idiots entering a Wikipedia search for her. If she becomes more notable then she can have her own article. TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.