The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanguine (brand)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no evidence online that the company meets the general notability guideline or the company-specific guideline. It's a little weird given that the company is almost 40 years old but that bit of data might have been copied from Versace like other bits of data I deleted earlier. And their website is a deadlink which is highly unusual nowadays. Pichpich (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as a test edit. The editor seems to have had an interest in Janet Henderson and then in this article another person with the name of "Henderson". The page in question started from Versace, but I can't find any connection on Google that this is something real. Unscintillating (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.