The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandstrom Products Company[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODded (courtesy @Courcelles:), which was challenged by creator. A BEFORE indicates a name change, but nothing approaching WP:ORG level coverage for this company. Star Mississippi 02:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Illinois. Star Mississippi 02:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of coverage. Their website, their Linkedin, then database listings are all Google turns up. I don't doubt the 1978 newspaper article mentioned talks about them, but if that's all there is for sourcing, we aren't at GNG. I can't find anything extra about them. Oaktree b (talk) 03:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely no coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because there is not enough significant coverage to justify the article. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.