The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandisk Sansa e260

[edit]

I propose to have this article deleted. There is already an exisiting article of the SanDisk Sansa and the Sansa e260 is actually the 4GB version of it. Enough said. --Jw21 (PenaltyKillah) 02:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CORP, redundant. MER-C 02:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Utterly useless. Edeans 03:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gan fon 04:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Already covered in said article. z ε n  08:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with SanDisk Sansa --Euzebia Zuk 10:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to SanDisk Sansa. -- Anas ^Talk? 12:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect this stub as above Jeepday 16:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not comply with NPOV and is not notable.Telly addict 17:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by the responses to this AfD, I went ahead and made it into a redirect.--Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 18:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the redirect Veesicle has made. —siro χ o 20:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Thanks a lot! I'm glad we don't need to merge it! --Jw21 (PenaltyKillah) 09:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing to merge. The information was already in the main article. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 11:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.