The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Porter[edit]

Sammy Porter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-promotional article on non-notable person. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy Porter--the version that was deleted was infinitely superior to this version in tone, content, and references. This is a different version and thus does not qualify for WP:G4, nor is it promotional enough for WP:G11 (if you disagree, go for it, with my blessing), and since it makes some sort of valid claim of importance I don't think WP:A7 applies. So here we are--delete for lack of notability per GNG and et cetera. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• why is my article nominated for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogoshzara (talk • contribs) 07:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 03:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I generally try and save musician articles. There's not much i can do here unfortunately. Non notable musician. Lourdes 18:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.