The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Bonfante

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested speedy deletion by multiple editors, no reason given. Non-notable person. No verifiable or reliable sources. A total of 4 GNews hits. Most GHits were self-promotional sites or social networking. GregJackP (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a mistake given whats going on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.80.4.160 (talk) 00:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Chronicle of Higher Education is highly notable, and so is the editor in chief and the publisher, but not necessarily people in such positions as Associate Publisher. Additionally, this article shows clear signs of having been copied from a press release. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant evidence of notability of this person. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage about him in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 12:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - DGG said it best. Also, I find it strange that several new accounts are editing the same article. APK whisper in my ear 01:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.