The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (WP:NAC) --Jmundo (talk) 19:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Urbain Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Despite the fact that this is a long, north-south street, passing through a number of notable districts and figuring in the title of the Richler novel, Saint Urban is a mainly residential street that, I fear, fails to pass WP:STREET or general notability requirements. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC) WITHDRAWN The Canadian Literary Landmarks alone clinches it for me. Sorry I'd missed that. I'll add it as a citation to the article immediately. Thanks, Oakshade. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Besides being a major street in Montreal with many notable places on it (Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal and Palais des congrès de Montréal for examples), it does seem to be the in-depth subject of secondary sources [1] and according to John Robert Colombo's book Canadian Literary Landmarks the street as very important literary significance [2], thus passing even the core criteria of WP:N.--Oakshade (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.