The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rystad Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn by nominator. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional article for WP:Run-of-the-mill consulting firm, coverage is of WP:ROUTINE events. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There is significant coverage by Norwegian business dailies Finansavisen and Dagens Næringsliv, so the coveraage is not of WP:ROUTINE events. It is also one of most cited consultancy in the oil sector, its analyzes cited also mainstream by agencies like Reuters and Bloomberg. Beagel (talk) 10:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, my google search returned several hits that look to support for WP:GNG Jeepday (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Agreed and I think we now have consensus? - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.