The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Holiday

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not indicate notability. Promotional in nature. No references. Creator appears to have a WP:COI. Contested CSD & Prod. GregJackP Boomer! 22:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or add sources ASAP. Right now, this article fails WP:CORP. Eddie.willers (talk) 00:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - either as spam or lack of context. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It isn't completely and utterly spam like I would prefer to speedy, but it does seem a bit suspect due to the use of so many images that came out of promotional works. I must agree that it makes no meaningful assertion of notability. I remain neutral on the issue of speedy deletion of this page. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.