The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. It isn't completely and utterly spam like I would prefer to speedy, but it does seem a bit suspect due to the use of so many images that came out of promotional works. I must agree that it makes no meaningful assertion of notability. I remain neutral on the issue of speedy deletion of this page. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.