The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rohan Rangarajan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An under-19 player that fails WP:NCRIC – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NCRIC. StAnselm (talk) 06:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This is WP:TOOSOON. Jack | ^{talk page} 11:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. not notable. Yet. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This cricketer has not played any First Class/List A cricket.Fails WP:NCRIC.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.