The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (series). Clear consensus against a standalone article. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rogue Squadron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a pure plot summary that fails WP:GNG. No reception section, no scholarly analysis, nothing. Well, there is a one sentence "Cultural impact" with trivia about references to this in another work of fiction. My BEFORE failed to find anything that is not a plot summary. Maybe an ATD could be a redirect to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (series)? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant to other plot summaries. Not enough WP:SIGCOV to establish this as a separate article. A redirect would be fine. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (series) per above as an alternative to deletion. Fails GNG as stated above. Tails Wx 18:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.