The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being relisted twice, there is no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rockwell Knuckles

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 02:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 18. Snotbot t • c » 04:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I'm not finding a whole lot on this artist in reliable sources, but there's the long Riverfront Times story [1] already referenced in the article, plus some coverage at NPR [2], Spinner [3], and smaller blurbs in Spin magazine [4] and The Village Voice [5]. All in all, I think there's just enough material to support an article. Gong show 08:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't know enough about this genre to vote, but there does seem to be a fair amount of material. The Village Voice entry, though, is in the blog rather than the main magazine. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.