The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 02:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement for non-notable company; heavy COI involvement. Orange Mike | Talk 00:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/PlasticsinCanadaMag.pdf http://www.canadianmanufacturing.com/design-engineering/motion-control-10/modular-robotics-10379 http://www.ept.ca/issues/story.aspx?aid=1000348213 http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/Un-Bel-example-d-innovation.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/HVAC/Pluming+HVACmagazineapril2010.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/HVAC/LANATROLLER-fait-le-menage.pdf http://www.sudouest.fr/2010/12/06/de-l-air-pour-nos-interieurs-259170-3220.php http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/HVAC/LeMondeInformatique.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/HVAC/lhebroMagazine.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/HVAC/QS.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/BIXI/Coup-Doeuil2009BIXI.pdf http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/BIXI/LeVolksvelo2008.pdf http://www.uquebec.ca/webuq/actualites/nouvelle.php?newsid=8571 http://www.etsmtl.ca/nouvelles/2009/Les-succes-du-Centech http://www.roboticsdesign.qc.ca/assets/Uploads/PDF-content/InThePress/ANATERGOARM/Al13JUIN2011.pdf http://www.omagdigital.com/publication/?i=70096&p=68
Note that artilces written in German have not been included here, and will be posted when I finish the page in German, and the website, too.
The fact that most articles don't mention Robotics Design is implied notability. They mention what it contributes to society, which is a lot, making it notable.
As for a mojor re-write, fantasic. Tell me what needs to be re-written, or what is not neutral. That is no reason for deletion. And to call all these other media sources other than Sudwest non-notable is a grave insult indeed.
This technology was nominated for national awards, and was notminated for more in two categories recently. The company is notable, the things it does are notable, and the things it makes are notable and do notable things. The only argument you have is the COI, which is not grounds for deletion, it is grounds for clean-up, a project that nobody has even done, they have only said to delete it. Yes deleting it would neutralize it, but not make it neutral.
Why is it that you want this page deleted so dearly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiansteve (talk • contribs) 02:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]