The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Coll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This man fails the guidelines for notability as little has been written about him; the article is unsourced Beerest 2 talk 02:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sources exist, mainly on the Pittsburgh Police Chief article and numerous others, he is of similar notability as another other major city 20th century administrator and deserves inclusion on the encyclopedia. For my part I will work to find more sources and and further data, however there are hundreds of Pittsburgh related stubs that can also use TLC to avoid any "Proposed Deletion" so my deepest sentiment on this would be to invite any and all to assist with the dozens of Police Chiefs, city and county agencies, parks, corporations and the like. Thank you for your care in this matter. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 05:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the article, migrated 3 references currently on wikipedia's Pittsburgh Police Chief article as well as added a few more, I will continue to work on expanding the article however not every important and necessary article will or should be lengthy. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 06:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.