The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

River Revival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced personal essay. PROD removed without explanation by article creator. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Obvious WP:ESSAY. It doesn't even pretend to be an article (starts with "Abstract", "Preamble"), so this is easy. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Essay. SL93 (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's not an essay, it's copied from this website: [1], and it has no references. I think if the policy is notable, an article can be written from references discussing the policy rather than uploading the policy to wikipedia. Pseudofusulina (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.