The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  ^talk 15:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rita Bakshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable and promotional. Much of the editing is by a clear coi editor supplemented by that on an undeclared paid editor--it should never have gotten out of Draft. . There is no evidence that the center she runs is "one of the most renowned IVF clinics in India." The references are all PR, PR apparently written by the same person for different publication. I know I am saying the Times of India article also is PR: to prove this, just read it. DGG ( talk ) 23:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, definitely PR. The RSP entry on The Times of India needs an update anyways, it's fairly well documented that it engages in undisclosed paid news as well and at the least shouldn't be used to determine notability when there's a lack of other reliable sources on the same. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article creator isn't even trying here. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: clearly paid article ChunnuBhai (talk) 19:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Astonished to see how this article has remained here for four years. Created by User:Dr. Rita Bakshi Senior IVF Specialist definitely is self promotion. It failed GNG then, it fails GNG now. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 20:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: clearly paid article ChunnuBhai (talk) 19:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC) _{Only one vote allowed. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 16:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)}[reply]
• Delete per nom.Note The Times of India piece is blog case study. My daughter is now a 2-year old IVF baby: Case Study not an article in The Times of India.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the excellent reasoning from all of the above Spiderone 10:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, PR Devokewater (talk) 12:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as others have said. -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and everyone else. Obviously promotional. HiwilmsTalk 07:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.