The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anas ^talk? 12:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Risk/Reward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

PROD was bulldozed by the author. No significant assertion of notability (e.g. film reviews). Shalom ^Hello 22:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Science Monitor Review New York Times Review

• Keep. Would it have really been that difficult to check the IMDb reviews page for this film before nominating this article for deletion? —Psychonaut 00:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on the link above Corpx 06:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the documentary concerns public figures and can be linked readily to existing articles. Bearian 16:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - IMDB link fixed, other references readily available to subjects of film. SkierRMH 04:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.