The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ricotta-filled ravioli

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is not encyclopedic, it is a cookbook. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 08:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Uncle Roy (talk) 09:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ravioli per WP:NOTCOOKBOOK, and it's a common filling for ravioli in a few countries. Uncle Roy (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect per Uncle Roy. C'mon. --Lockley (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lockley, that's correct! --cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 02:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article is literally a recipe. Possibly a speedy candidate. This isn't a search-term that needs a redirect. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Power~enwiki, Wikipedia is not a cookbook, it is an encyclopedia, per WP:NOTCOOKBOOK. Delete this page. --cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 09:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.