The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singu larity 03:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richland Mall

[edit]

Unsourced, poorly written article on a non-notable mall in Ohio. No sources found in an online search. Fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 03:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Although it is possible to verify the contents of this mall, there are issues on notability. However, it must be taken into consideration that a google search shows up about 33 000 hits for this mall. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 04:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there's at least one other Richland Mall (in Waco, Texas) also turning up in those hits. Also note that most of those hits are for directories. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 04:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are not only multiple Richland Malls, but if you follow the Google search to its last page, you find there's actually only 734 unique hits, and most of them are useless template-spam. wikipediatrix 04:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 04:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion that this is a notable mall. i ^said 00:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:N nor WP:CORP. If they make an area small enough ("on the specific titles occupied...") then of cours it will be the first enclosed mall in X.Ga rr ie 22:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.