The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 08:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kahlbaugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a non notable business man who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Notability isn’t inherited by proximity to “what may be notable” hence being “general counsel” for a publicly traded company doesn’t confer notability. A before search leads me user generated unreliable sources Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The subject has a job. There's not much beyond that. Coverage mentions him in relation to the company, but it isn't in-depth or significant or focused on him. --Kbabej (talk) 23:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm in agreement with Kbabej. Here's the Google news search. It's about the companies he works for, not him. As it stands, a failure of WP:NBIO threshold. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete coverage is about his firm not him fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.