The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reuel Marc Gerecht (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pundit, but no assertion of how or why he's notable Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No evidence of significant discussion about him rather than by him, and he therefore fails WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• weak Delete - I have contributed to this article but must agree that he is not really notable. He has been around in media here and there in few places, depends where one draws the line for notability. Farmanesh (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.