The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect to Requiem (Jenkins). (non-admin closure) — Yash ^talk stalk 01:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requiem (Karl Jenkins album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From what I can tell, a non-notable WP:NALBUM.

We have an article for the piece itself here: Requiem (Jenkins). This article should be redirected there. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  08:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  08:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  08:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect - Per nom, doesn't meet WP:NALBUM on its own. Merge and redirect to Requiem (Jenkins). (So what little information there is on the album is dealt with in the article on the "single"). Guliolopez (talk) 10:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect - This article could only be justified if there were a rule to allow every album released by a recognised label to have an article. In the absence of that rule it is clear from the WP:NALBUM guideline that more is required, and that the requirement is not met by this album. There is no good reason why details of the album could not be set out in article on the work itself, especially in light of the contemporaneity of composition and album. Syek88 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect as per Guliolopez.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.