The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship activism

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced (except for one fake source that points to a nearly empty site), this original research/synthesis essay appears to fail general notability guidelines due to insignificant coverage of the term after a good faith search for reliable sources. Moogwrench (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as someone's personal manifesto. Searching for this produced remarkably poor results, and no even vaguely relevant news or book hits; even the web hits didn't seem relevant. Mangoe (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research and for lack of notability. There is nothing wrong publishing your personal manifesto on the web, but WP is the wrong venue. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.: OR, fails GNG. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NEO. --Odie5533 (talk) 08:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR Curb Chain (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.