The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salt can be asked at WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redactem (video game)

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find video game sources: "Redactem (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article topic (indie video game) lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Sources currently used in article are unreliable (no reputation for editorial credibility or fact-checking.) Redactem had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ((ping)) me. czar 03:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 03:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Name seemed familiar to me. Turns out it was already deleted via AfD before Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redactem. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I wish I had caught that. It's a different draft so not G4-eligible but both should be salted after this, at least czar 19:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.