This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ALREADY SPEEDIED, but not by me. -Splash 03:20, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Due to "various accounts of spontaneous human combustion occurring in her vicinity" I might regret listing this article here, but I'll take my chances. An article about a witch-princess, who seems to have taken to using Wikipedia at the age of 203 (since the author has the same text on her user page). Notable for her proficiency at weaving offal into gold, and for working as a part-time celestial spy and full-time in abecedarian espionage. However, I'm afraid all this might be unverifiable. Alarm 18:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the spontaneous human combustion portion of my bio, as I can see how in today's political climate it might be construed the wrong way. I can assure you though that, like the bio itself, it was written in fun, and was meant to reflect my whimsical nature. I certainly meant no harm by it. Undream 18:14, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy to User: Undream's page. You could certainly keep it there. Users are free to put what they want on their userpages within reason. Capitalistroadster 18:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an article. She should be welcome to copy it to her user page. ➥the Epopt 18:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, vanity MH 18:58, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Speed deleted as a fabrication. Wile E. Heresiarch 19:13, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.