The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. The nominator expressed concerns about paid editing involvement with the article, which can be further discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard if desired. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ravivaar With Star Parivaar[edit]

Ravivaar With Star Parivaar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG ( This page was placed in draft; the user moved it. Tv Show Is Notable But All Source PR And doubt paid editing. ) PravinGanechari (talk) 13:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. PravinGanechari (talk) 13:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the article was moved to draftspace due to lack of references, we added the references and then another user Jha09 moved the page to mainspace. The articles are all from reliable sources as per WP:ICTFSOURCES and what you are saying is pr articles they are actually behind the scenes or articles on excepts of the episodes. Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article has proper reference. All the other inputs are mentioned clearly. Does not find any need to delete it. And is not a pr based show neither the ref. are pr. Jha09 (talk)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- seems to be notable, but the page should be rewritten. --不和の林檎 (talk) 07:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep - nominator themselves states that show is notable and this is an article content issue. Content issues shouldn't be litigated at AfD. matt91486 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I have tried to make the content better, moreover as it is a notable show, everyone should contribute in making the content rich. Sources are reliable too..Jha09
• Keep: Seems notable. DoraShin15, 13:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.