The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid arnis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable martial arts style without reliable third person sources to justify notability Dwanyewest (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — Janggeom (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced article that fails to show notability. I got a lot of ghits, but not reliable sources. There's a lot of comments on it at various forums, but nothing reliable. Astudent0 (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article makes no claims of notability and I found no independent sources to support this art's notability. Papaursa (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.