The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and move to the correct spelling. I'm using Rambriksh Benipuri, as it is the variant with the most Google hits, and will create a redirect from Ramvriksh Benipuri. Sandstein (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ramavriksha Benipuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notability. The article claims this man was a "prominent writer" but google returns less than 40 hist for him (mostly wiki mirrors) and Amazon, zero. The article is full of positive pov, as if written by an admirer. This may well be a hoax, since a search for one of his books returns only 2 ghits, the article itself and a mirror. Damiens.rf 20:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Well, certainly cleanup is warranted. Keep in mind per countering systemic bias that topics outside of the English language mainstream may be written by people for whom English is not their first language, or as in India, highly dialecticized. You may want to adjust your antennae because this didn't read as spam to me, just inappropriate in tone. --Dhartung | Talk 01:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, Kazi Nazrul Islam is one of the featured articles :). Yes, undoubtedly the POVs should be suitably dealt with and removed from Ramavriksha Benipuri. --Bhadani (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.