This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Sikon 11:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while I have no (urgent) issues with his linked webcomics having a wikipedia article, I definitely don't feel that every webcomic artist should also have their own personal page where they mention that they're "available for commission" and such. Sherurcij 05:14, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, if he's authored three notable webcomics. Kappa 05:27, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per Kappa's arguments. Perhaps the line about commissions should be left out. Wikipedia is not a place for advertisements. Mistercow 05:46, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I took that line out. Kappa 12:10, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, unless we are imminently running out of resources to be an encyclopedia. —RaD Man (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, based on being an author/artist of 2 or more notable works with separate wikipedia articles as long as it remains "neutral".Ann Vole 01:01, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.