The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Sikandar Sultan[edit]

Raja Sikandar Sultan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no in depth coverage in RS. the user who created this BLP has been blocked for socking. Saqib (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Every Morning (there's a halo...) 05:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as entry fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There is in depth coverage including the articles cited. I don't understand the basis for this non. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note to all The page was recreated after a WP:REFUND application, approximately 8 hours after being previously deleted, on the grounds of (what I can see) being inherently notable. Nightfury 14:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- does not meet WP:NPOL & significant RS coverage not found. Created by Special:Contributions/Rashid_Ghafoor currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts. The page looks like a tribute page / possibly UPE. WP:DENY applies as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.