The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sens Unik. That AfD was over two years ago, and I'm quite sure guidelines have changed since then. Merging would not be appropriate, redirect is better. Sr13 02:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rade[edit]

Rade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article was nominated for deletion before, the concensus was Delete Keep according to the archived discussion, and the article seems to have returned. Whoever this person is is still a non-notable ex-band member who has nothing better to do than "multimedia projects" these days. K-lit 04:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC) To add I must have read the deletion log incorrectly, I think I linked to the wrong page. Still, there's nothing I can find notable about this person. Please consider this in building concensus for this nomination, and don't consider my erroneous comment about the deletion log.K-lit 14:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I wasn't able to find anything in the deletion log, but it makes no difference. Delete as nonnotable per WP:MUSIC. There is at least one external source for this guy, but that's not quite enough. He's produced five albums, but it says that he "will" make another one in 2005. Since 2005 there have been about seven edits to this article. I don't think it will be missed. Shalom ^Hello 05:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let me modify my opinion. The deletion discussion was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rade, and the result was keep (nomination withdrawn). It was not a unanimous decision, but most users decided that he was notable, and I'm in no position to disagree. Some suggested a redirect to Sens Unik. Shalom ^Hello 05:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DES ^(talk) 17:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete per lack of coverage on this guy. I dont believe notability is inherited Corpx 21:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I could scarcely find any coverage of this guy, except in relation to this group he was with. I just can't understand how he's notable on his own.FoamParty 05:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.