The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punkradiocast.com (now Punk Radio Cast)[edit]

Claims of listenership are unreferenced. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. There are some google hits for this website but most news stories are about bands who have appeared here, not about the station itself. Is this streaming radio station notable? Rtphokie (talk) 03:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: possible self-promotion [1] insufficient 3rd party coverage. JamesBurns (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above user has been blocked for using sock puppets to vote-stack at AfDs. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The following comments by Minklinkdink were on the article talk page. I'm offering no opinion of my own at the moment about deletion.Phil Bridger (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why the LARGEST Streaming PUNK ROCK Website would be Questioned for Notability. The One who has questioned that also stats that they have found several third party links from Bands that have been played on the site. Also as for 3rd party coverage Check the section entitled PRC in MEDIA there you will find Stories in AP which is a Notable music industry Publication. Minklinkdink (talk) 02:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of third party references for the Notability of Punk Radio Cast. Minklinkdink (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —Dravecky (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No one is questioning how great the station is, it's just that it's really written as a promotional thing. The article of recent news is kinda useless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabochon (talk • contribs) 01:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:PROMOTION. A-Kartoffel (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Struck !vote of sock puppet. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -Drdisque (talk) 03:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've cleaned up the article, moved it to a new title, and trimmed out nearly all of the spam and junk. The sources are somewhat iffy, but they do hold water. GlassCobra 12:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GlassCobra's improvements and clean up. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.