The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 09:07Z

Project Galileo[edit]

Project Galileo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is an article about a UK school's astronomy project. No assertion is made as to why this project is notable (despite the article having existed for over a year). The article is not supported by any references.

It should be noted however that the article was previously nominated for deletion here and the result was keep. Nonetheless I feel it fails WP:N and WP:V. WjBscribe 02:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep, the project in itself is by far vaster than your average high school project, my problem is that I see no external reference and therefore notability is rightly questioned. I would proceed with an unreferenced tag and if no sources are added than and then proceed to deletion. Alf photoman 16:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have added sources, and rewritten the text to turn some unattributed PR copy into a quote. I note there will be a rather complicated disam page to write, as there are some much larger projects known by this name and similar names. DGG 19:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep —xanderer 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Unlike most such projects, the scope of this one suggests notability. I'm not happy about the quality of the references, but expect that they can be found, so I'd like to give this one the benefit of the doubt for now. Tag for References/Cleanup. WMMartin 13:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per revisions/notability. - Denny 06:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.