The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Property (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The sources used in the article are either citing people from the company for quotes, or are very local coverage of the company's charity donations. Googling, I'm not finding the sort of in-depth coverage we're looking for - there's some coverage on founder Rob Moore, talking about how how he got his money and how he spends it on things like Ferraris and (less than a month later) how he totaled a Ferrari, and this fill-in-the-form "interview". The biggest things I can find on the company's work is This Spectator article which covers how scammy their efforts appear and this review claiming their classes are a scam. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It should have an article to alert people to their activities before they get involved, unfortunately there aren't the reliable sources to write such an article so we will be better off with no article than a PR piece. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Struggling to find enough independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Can find nothing worthwhile beyond what Nat Gertler mentions above. Agree with Philafrenzy - if we cannot find enough to warn readers about the company, we should delete the article to avoid it being used as a promotional vehicle. Edwardx (talk) 11:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.